Tuesday, May 14, 2013

Week 10 Presentation Reflection 1



Group Presentation 4: Conflict (Group Name: DCLD)

Grade: CR

Assessment Criteria

  • CLARITY OF THE ORAL PRESENTATION_ Does the oral presentation communicate a clear, concise and appropriately delivered Group Theoretical Position?

Generally, it was clear and this group present a good theory of what conflict is. And again, I recommend them to give a brief introduction and clear transfer between each member. This will definitely made the whole presentation clear and impressive.


  • CLARITY OF THE WRITTEN PRESENTATION_ Does the Written presentation communicate a clear, concise and appropriately delivered Group Theoretical Position?

The majority of the written presentation was quite good. But some of their group members were reading the powerpoint slides which was not good. Also, their PPT slides were not fluent. During the presentation, their slides changed frequently and that was a little bit annoying for audience.


  • DISTINCTIVENESS AND SPECIFICITY OF THE EXAMPLES_ Are the examples used to elaborate the particular theme of collaboration distinctive and specific?

Generally, their examples were good, especially their models of conflict and also the flow graph of how conflict react to others. That helped audience to understand conflict conceptually. The weakness was that images was too small to read, in most cases, I can only hear but not read. However, They didn’t relate those concept into their own group which was the most impressive part we want to hear.


  • REFERENCING_ Are all sources of content properly referenced?

Yes, they had references but beware of the reference format.


  • THE CONCEPTUAL CONTEXT_ Is it clear that the students have a strong grasp of the conceptual context of their theme of collaboration?

They had a general concept about what conflict is. But during their presentation, I found their collaboration was not good enough. Some group members didn’t do much preparations than others.


  • THE STILL IMAGE_ Do the still images support and extend our understanding of the Group Theoretical Position the students are presenting?

To be honest, there was nothing much relates to image. But I really appreciate their flow graph that demonstrates conflict between people.

No comments:

Post a Comment