Week 8 Presentation Reflection

Group Presentation 1: Planning (Group Name: Interactive Architecture)

Grade: CR

Assessment Criteria

• CLARITY OF THE ORAL PRESENTATION_ Does the oral presentation communicate a clear, concise and appropriately delivered Group Theoretical Position?

Oral presentation can be regarded as clear. But personal recommendation is to give a brief introduction before the whole presentation in order to provide a general sense for the audience. Also, if they can relate the presentation to their project, that would be fantastic. What audience wanna hear is how the concept was used in their project, not purely conceptual knowledge.

• CLARITY OF THE WRITTEN PRESENTATION_ Does the Written presentation communicate a clear, concise and appropriately delivered Group Theoretical Position?

Written presentation was clear, but what I found among their presentation was their prezi slides had a huge difference between each other. Some slides were quite empty and some of them were quite narrow and busy to read. As an audience, I hope everything can be continuous and easy. We don’t really need a beautiful slide but a simple and powerful one.

• DISTINCTIVENESS AND SPECIFICITY OF THE EXAMPLES_ Are the examples used to elaborate the particular theme of collaboration distinctive and specific?

I can see they did a lot of research for this presentation to find examples in real world for example the multi-functional cup rail and that did help us to understand the difference between those types of intellectual property. The large amount of examples they did effectively demonstrate the specific areas of IP.

• REFERENCING_ Are all sources of content properly referenced?

Yes, they had references but their references were hidden by the navigation tool bar.

• THE CONCEPTUAL CONTEXT_ Is it clear that the students have a strong grasp of the conceptual context of their theme of collaboration?

They had a general concept about what intellectual property is. Again, I still recommend them a link IP with their project. Using what they learned might be more convincing. Also, task distribution is not that good. Some of their group members apparently did less preparation than others and I can only see people changes frequently and I have no idea about who did which section.

• THE STILL IMAGE_ Do the still images support and extend our understanding of the Group Theoretical Position the students are presenting?

Yes, their images had a strong sense relating to the topic. By using real cases, audience can understand the meaning and difference of different types of IP easily.